If I turn on the TV in the next two weeks, it won't be for the Olympics. Here's a few reasons
1. Sports has nothing to do with nationalism yet that is what's played up.- So an Ethiopian can win a long distance race or some Bulgarian woman can life weights the equivalent of my co worker's weekly Oreo intake. I am not sure how any of that defines their nation.
2. Rampant Cheating- Do I really need to put anything here? Link 1 Link 2 Link 3 Link 4 Link 5
3. It's sports for people who don't watch sports.- people who will watch will define the winners mostly by their country not by their name. It becomes a one variable equation (medals) . It has nothing to do with humans and their ability to test their limits.
4. It all starts from the top- Juan Antonio Samaranch did everything possible to see that every ideal you once believed the Olympics to be is an illusion . Link 1 Link 2 Link 3 Link 4
5. I am never one for band wagon jumping - It's no surprise to you regulars I love NFL & NCAA Football and MLB Baseball. I want news about those sports all 52 weeks of the year. I could not tell you about one luge , rowing equestrian, diving event from 2007. Why the heck should I start now?
6. Rampant Cheating Part 2 - How can you take any event seriously that inspires biological males to compete as women for the top prize? Don't believe me ??? Click I beg of you
7. Host Nation- why it's tolerated, the commercial agenda, how very few care. All here .
8. Any sport with judges is not really a sport. - As usual I owe Dan Wetzel a lot. Read the story below or click here
Believe it or not I will post at some point a positive Olympic story but guaranteed few of you have heard of it.
In case you care to argue that people cheat in football and baseball, my argument for that is that the competition itself is still worth watching. I know the nuances and the history of those sports. Can you tell me the same of race walk, pole vaulting, 200 M dash , handball, badminton? I didn't think so. In the meantime if any of you see the events differently let me know.
Ed
TURIN, Italy – Figure skating is not a sport.
Now, before you whip off your Risport and spike the blade through my aorta, please note that I think figure skaters are not just athletes, but remarkable athletes.
Figure skating requires strength, speed, stamina, dexterity, balance, timing, guts and just about everything other imaginable athletic skill. Certainly, more athletic skill than I could muster.
But figure skating is a competition, not a sport, and it has nothing to do with how difficult or entertaining it is. It is simply a matter of how the winner is determined. It is the same for gymnastics, diving, beauty pageants or anything that chooses a champion solely by human judging.
A sport needs to have a quantifiable way to determine a winner and a loser. There can be no debate about the scoring system. A ball must go into a goal or through a hoop; a runner must reach home or finish before the others. The winners run faster, jump higher, score more.
In some sports a clock is used to determine a winner, but the clock is not subjective. Besides, you can't have 53 guys racing down a ski hill at the same time. The clock is a judge, but it is an objective one.
Figure skating has none of this. Everything is about interpretation of success. It is about what the judge thinks, believes, feels. There is nothing absolutely quantifiable. Yes, the number of revolutions in a jump counts, but in the end if two people do the same jump, a human has to decide which one he or she likes better.
That is not a sport.
Figure skaters wear elaborate costumes in an attempt to appear more appealing, more flowing, more beautiful. The women (and even some men) wear makeup, they get their hair done, they wear jewelry, they play stirring music.
An ugly person would stand at a considerable, if not insurmountable, disadvantage in skating. Sasha Cohen would whip them every time.
As absurd as the Tonya Harding-Nancy Kerrigan drama that propelled skating into stratosphere was, it was based partially on the fact that it is a competition, not a sport. Harding was a powerful skater, possibly better at all aspects of skating than Kerrigan. But she was shorter, stockier and less feminine. Although Harding had defeated Kerrigan on occasion, she knew she was at a disadvantage against the taller, prettier, more graceful Kerrigan.
So she conspired with her boyfriend to have Kerrigan whacked in one of her skinny little knees.
In a real sport, this wouldn't have been necessary. Ugly people can win in track, in skiing, in the NFL, in soccer.
Beauty doesn't matter. Style doesn't count. There are no judges.
Some will argue that referees are essentially judges, determining who scores and who doesn't. But a referee is merely there to assure order and make the competitors follow the rules.
Yes, in most sports, the referee has the freedom to determine right and wrong by what he sees – a false start, an illegal advantage – but he is not determining the final victor. His assignment is to simply ensure fair play. The refs can't just say that while one team scored more points, they thought the other one was better anyway.
This creates a bizarre paradox where something like curling is a sport and figure skating isn't, even though to compare the level of necessary athletic ability is comical. But it is what it is. You have to be a stunning athlete to compete in the NBA Slam Dunk Contest but that doesn't make it a sport.
There is one exception to this no-judges rule: boxing (or kickboxing, or other fighting sports). This is fine because a clear victor can be achieved with a knockout (no judge needed). The judges are only used when the fight has gone on so long that it has to be stopped for the safety of the competitors. If they keep beating on each other, someone could die.
Of course, the presence of judges is why boxing is considered the most corrupt sport.
Other than that, no judge should ever determine a winner in a true sport. When you have that, whether it is ice skating, gymnastics or diving, you have a competition.
It isn't any different than American Idol. It can be fun to watch, the athletes can be talented and tenacious, it can be a great competition, but it isn't a sport.
It just isn't.
Dan Wetzel is Yahoo! Sports' national columnist. Send Dan a question or comment for potential use in a future column or webcast.
http://sports.yahoo.com/olympics/torino2006/figure_skating/news?slug=dw-figsnosport022006&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
Posts
